Featured

Why messaging and texting over LoRa networks isn’t likely to happen

On our latest IoT Podcast episode, we take a question that Adam left on our IoT Voicemail hotline. Adam was thinking that the wireless spectrum used by Amazon Sidewalk and other decentralized LoRaWAN networks might be useful for communications. Specifically, the long-range networks could provide messaging or text services to areas with little or no cellular coverage. I agree with Adam, as I suggested the same use case not long after Amazon announced Sidewalk back in 2019.

But it’s now 2022 and consumers still can’t use Sidewalk, or really any other LoRaWAN service in lieu of traditional instant messaging or SMS purposes. And there are some good reasons for this.

First, the target audience for communication over Sidewalk, Helium, or another LoRaWAN implementation is relatively small. At least here in the U.S., it is since a majority of the population has cellular coverage.

US LTE coverage map Image courtesy of the FCC

Yes, there are still “holes” in the cellular network coverage areas, but they don’t impact most people. In other regions or countries, it might be a different story. But as Stacey notes in our podcast, the denser population areas in those places are the ones that have cellular coverage.

The second reason is a business one that largely follows the first. Is there a viable business model to offer person-to-person LoRaWAN communications and be profitable? A few companies have tried with unlicensed or non-cellular network technologies. And they’ve either pivoted away from that goal or aren’t around any longer.

For example, there have been peer-to-peer mesh networking apps for messaging in the earlier days of Android, like Serval. Some of these were used when governments in the Middle East and Africa shut down internet access. Each phone with the Serval app crates a large mesh network for communication within that mesh network. And if any of those phones have internet access, messages can be routed out around the world.

Commotion Wireless is another, similar example but it’s more of a DIY solution. However, these solutions use traditional Bluetooth and/or Wi-Fi, not any long-range radio protocols. Rumble is an Android messaging app that uses these radios too, although when I last checked, its server was down. You can view the Rumble source code on Github, however. Orion Labs attempted to create a push-to-talk solution using non-traditional networks but at this point, the company focuses on using the cloud for such communications.

For now, then, it doesn’t appear we’ll be using these newer long-range networks for emergency or distributed communications. The business model challenge and limited demand don’t make it a viable option.

To hear Adam’s question, as well as our discussion in full on the topic, tune in to the IoT Podcast below:

Kevin C. Tofel

Share
Published by
Kevin C. Tofel

Recent Posts

Episode 437: Goodbye and good luck

This is the final episode of The Internet of Things Podcast, and to send us…

8 months ago

So long, and thanks for all the insights

This article was originally published in my weekly IoT newsletter on Friday August 18, 2023.…

8 months ago

We are entering our maintenance era

This article was originally published in my weekly IoT newsletter on Friday August 18, 2023.…

8 months ago

IoT news of the week for August 18, 2023

Verdigris has raised $10M for smarter buildings: I am so excited by this news, because roughly eight…

8 months ago

Podcast: Can Alexa (and the smart home) stand on its own?

Amazon's head of devices, David Limp, plans to retire as part of a wave of executives that…

8 months ago

Z-Wave gets a boost with new chip provider

If you need any more indication that Matter is not going to kill all of…

8 months ago